Monday, April 9, 2012
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
1:30 PM Math 1150 Meeting 447 MSC
4:30 PM Analysis Seminar 459 MSC
Swarup Ghosh, BGSU
A Counterexample to the Peak Point Conjecture (Part I)
In 1957, Andrew Gleason conjectured that for a function
algebra A on X, if every point in X is a peak point for
A, then A = C(X), known as peak point
conjecture. However, in 1968, in his
Ph.D. dissertation, Brian Cole constructed a
counterexample to this conjecture. In this talk, we
will discuss Cole's counterexample and related
conjectures.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
11:00 AM Math 1150 Meeting 459 MSC
2:30 PM Putnam Team Meeting 445 MSC
2:30 PM Graduate Student Seminar 459 MSC
Swarup Ghosh, BGSU
Maximal ideal space of rings of continuous functions of
compact topological spaces (Part II)
In the theory of rings of continuous functions, it is
obvious that the ring structure of C(X), the collection
of all real valued continuous functions on a
topological space X, is completely determined by the
properties of the space X. An important problem is to
specify conditions under which, conversely, X
determined as a topological space by the algebraic
structure of C(X). We shall present a result that
represents one of the milestones in the development of
this theory: within the class of compact spaces, the
ring structure of C(X) determines X up to
homeomorphism.
7:00 PM BGSU student actuarial science club 224 MSC
The BGSU student actuarial club hosts Cincinnati
Financial, an actuarial employer. Everyone interested
in learning about actuarial careers is welcome; free
pizza and soft drinks will be provided.
Friday, April 13, 2012
3:30 PM Refreshments 459 MSC
3:45 PM Colloquium 459 MSC
Dr. Shiming Zheng, College of Public Health, East
Tennessee State University
Random Regression Models for the Longitudinal Data
Analysis Subject to Left Censoring and Informative
Drop-outs and Based On The Skew Elliptically Contoured
Distribution Assumptions
The class of skew ECDs is large and accommodates
distributions which are both symmetric and asymmetric,
with both heavy tails and thin tails. It also
accommodates distributions with large range of skewness
and with different levels of kurtosis such as
leptokurtic and platykurtic or mesokurtic
distributions. Under the skew ECD assumptions, the
outcome variables can be modeled and predicted more
accurately and precisely, the (1-alpha)100% prediction
confidence intervals are narrower and the estimators
are more robust if we deal with some skewed data. First
we extend the distribution assumption from the normal
to the ECD for random regression models used in
analysis of longitudinal data accounting for both
undetectable values and informative drop-outs. Then we
extend further to the skew ECD distribution assumption
for the same models. For the unimodal asymmetric
continuous data, the skew ECD models fit the data
better than the ECD models, which are better than
classical normal models. To illustrate usefulness of
our models we use the data from the HIV Epidemiology
Research Study (HERS).
A list of mathematics seminars by subject and other seminars at BGSU is available here.
If you have comments or material for the calendar, send e-mail to Barbara Berta,
If you wish to be placed on the e-mail
distribution list, send e-mail
to Craig Zirbel,
Previous calendars are available individually
or in one single file for searching.
Return to Math & Stat Home Page / BGSU Welcome Page
/
/ Disclaimer