next up previous
Next: Additional assumptions and Fréchet Up: Mathematical Framework Previous: Variational Formulation of the

Continuity of the forward map

 

In this section demonstrate continuity and Gateaux differentiability of tex2html_wrap_inline2063 under our current assumptions on tex2html_wrap_inline1703 . In subsequent subsections we show that, with additional assumptions, Fréchet differentiability may be obtained.

As we are interested in inverse problems involving the determination of a particular q from knowledge or partial knowledge of F(q) we discuss the regularity of the map F. The following lemma, essentially due to Gutman [15], will be useful.

  lemma252


PROOF: In preparation for considering tex2html_wrap_inline2079 we have, for tex2html_wrap_inline2081 ,

  equation957

so tex2html_wrap_inline2083 . Also, tex2html_wrap_inline2085 implies tex2html_wrap_inline2087 . Thus it suffices to show that tex2html_wrap_inline2017 , tex2html_wrap_inline2087 implies tex2html_wrap_inline2093 But since K is a compact subset of tex2html_wrap_inline2097 , the set tex2html_wrap_inline2099 is compact in tex2html_wrap_inline1785 . The result then follows directly from [15, Lemma 3.1,]. We shall also have need of the following simple formulae:

   eqnarray964

To show (23), we note that from the linearity of tex2html_wrap_inline2103 we have tex2html_wrap_inline2105 . Left-multiplying this equation by tex2html_wrap_inline2107 and right-multiplying by tex2html_wrap_inline2109 yields (23). Equation (24) follows similarly.

From (23) and Lemma 2.1, we can easily establish the continuity of tex2html_wrap_inline2063 .

  theorem284


PROOF: We need to show that for fixed tex2html_wrap_inline2121 , tex2html_wrap_inline2123 as tex2html_wrap_inline2085 . But from the definition (21) of F, the inverse perturbation formula (23), and the bound (19), we have

eqnarray973

Letting K be the singleton tex2html_wrap_inline2131 in Lemma 2.1, we obtain the result.


Gordon Wade
Fri Mar 13 12:20:07 EST 1998